The Label "RFC"
draft-thomson-rfcplusplus-label-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Martin Thomson | ||
| Last updated | 2019-01-03 (latest revision 2018-07-02) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-rfcplusplus-label-00.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-rfcplusplus-label-00.txt
Abstract
The perception and reality of the RFC series have long been separate. More than 20 years of attempts to correct perception, starting with RFC 1796, have been unsuccessful. This document proposes an experiment to see if changing the labels on document will have any effect on fixing that problem.
Authors
Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@gmail.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)