A Problem Statement to Motivate Work on Locale-free Unicode Identifiers
draft-sullivan-lucid-prob-stmt-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Andrew Sullivan , Asmus Freytag | ||
Last updated | 2015-09-10 (Latest revision 2015-03-09) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Internationalization techniques that the IETF has adopted depended on some assumptions about the way characters get added to Unicode. Some of those assumptions turn out not to have been true. Discussion is necessary to determine how the IETF should respond to the new understanding of how Unicode works.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)