@techreport{staykov-hu-json-canonical-form-00,
    number =    {draft-staykov-hu-json-canonical-form-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-staykov-hu-json-canonical-form/00/},
    author =    {Georgi Staykov and Jeff Hu},
    title =     {{JSON Canonical Form}},
    pagetotal = 3,
    year =      2012,
    month =     nov,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {A single JSON document can have multiple logically equivalent physical representations. While convenient for human interaction, this flexibility is inconvenient for cases where a machine is used to assess the logical equivalence of documents. In cases where logical equivalence is useful, an encoder should produce a canonical form of a JSON document. For example, since digital signatures demand the same physical representation for logically equivalent documents, a canonical physical representation would allow the signature to apply to the logical document. This internet draft has the goal to define a canonical form of JSON documents. Two logically equivalent documents should have same canonical form.},
}