Analysis of DNS Forwarder Scenario Relative to DDR and DNR
draft-stark-add-dns-forwarder-analysis-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara Stark , Chris Box | ||
| Last updated | 2021-12-18 (Latest revision 2021-06-16) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft analyzes the behaviors that residential end users and home network owners (e.g., parents of young children) might experience when operating systems and clients support [I-D.ietf-add-ddr] and/or [I-D.ietf-add-dnr] for discovery of encrypted DNS services and the CE router of the home network offers itself as the Do53 resolver. This use case is explicitly mentioned in [I-D.ietf-add-requirements] Section 3.2 and has several requirements related to it. This draft has two goals: determine if the analysis it provides is accurate and, if it is accurate, determine if the behavior is acceptable to the WG or if there should be changes to either of the discovery mechanisms.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)