%% You should probably cite draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-16 instead of this revision.
@techreport{song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-10,
    number =    {draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry/10/},
    author =    {Haoyu Song and Greg Mirsky and Clarence Filsfils and Ahmed Abdelsalam and Tianran Zhou and Zhenbin Li and Jongyoon Shin and Kyungtae Lee},
    title =     {{Postcard-based On-Path Flow Data Telemetry using Packet Marking}},
    pagetotal = 11,
    year =      2021,
    month =     jul,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {The document describes a packet-marking variation of the Postcard- Based Telemetry (PBT), referred to as PBT-M. Similar to the instruction-based PBT (i.e., IOAM DEX), PBT-M does not carry the telemetry data in user packets but send the telemetry data through a dedicated packet. Unlike the instruction-based PBT, PBT-M does not require an extra instruction header. PBT-M raises some unique issues that need to be considered. This document formally describes the high level scheme and cover the common requirements and issues when applying PBT-M in different networks. PBT-M is complementary to the other on-path telemetry schemes such as IOAM.},
}