Postcard-based On-Path Flow Data Telemetry
draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-07
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Haoyu Song , Tianran Zhou , Zhenbin Li , Jongyoon Shin , Kyungtae Lee | ||
| Last updated | 2020-10-15 (Latest revision 2020-04-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The document describes a variation of the Postcard-Based Telemetry (PBT), the marking-based PBT. Unlike the instruction-based PBT, as embodied in [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export], the marking-based PBT does not require the encapsulation of a telemetry instruction header so it avoids some of the implementation challenges of the instruction-based PBT. This documents discuss the issues and solutions of the marking-based PBT.
Authors
Haoyu Song
Tianran Zhou
Zhenbin Li
Jongyoon Shin
Kyungtae Lee
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)