Representation and Verification of Domain-Based Application Service Identity within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificates in the Context of Transport Layer Security (TLS)
draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-14
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Recuse
(Peter Saint-Andre)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-20)
Unknown
I am ballotting "no objection" based on only a partial review, and trust of the ADs who are authors, ballotted "yes", and raised Discusses.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-17)
Unknown
Section 1.5., paragraph 8: > These suggestions are not entirely consistent with all practices that > are currently followed by certification authorities, client > developers, and service providers. However, they reflect the best > aspects of current practices and are expected to become more widely > adopted in the coming years. This seems to argue that the doc should be a BCP and not a PS? Section 1.8., paragraph 28: > Transport Layer Security [TLS] negotiation; in this specfication Nit: s/specfication/specification/ Appendix A., paragraph 1: > recommendations in this specfication: email [EMAIL-SRV] and XMPP Nit: s/specfication:/specification:/ Section 7.2., paragraph 1: > Implemenations MUST NOT match any form of wildcard, such as a Nit: s/Implemenations/Implementations/
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown