Skip to main content

Instant Messaging and Presence Purpose for the Call-Info Header Field in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-saintandre-impp-call-info-04

Yes

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Richard Barnes)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -03) Unknown

                            
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -03) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2013-05-28 for -03) Unknown
This is more for the RAI ADs than anything else (no action requested from the document authors).

In 2.  Security Considerations

   Advertising an endpoint's XMPP address over SIP could inform
   malicious entities about an alternative attack vector.  Because the
   "purpose" header field parameter could be spoofed, the receiving
   endpoint ought to check the value against an authoritative source
   such as a user directory.  Clients can integrity protect and encrypt
   this header field using end-to-end mechanisms such as S/MIME or hop-
   by-hop mechanisms such as TLS.

We're talking about a SIP client (with an XMPP address in a SIP header field parameter), is that right? Has S/MIME gotten much deployment to date? I know we didn't even mention S/MIME in SIPconnect 1.1 (http://www.sipforum.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,476/Itemid,261/)
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-05-30 for -03) Unknown
no objection on the basis of the revised id that will be coming
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-05-24 for -03) Unknown
Would there be other capabilities that you'd want to advertise?  Like here's my certificate?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2013-05-31) Unknown
Thanks for considering my discuss point.

S.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown