@techreport{rsalz-drbg-speck-wap-wep-01,
    number =    {draft-rsalz-drbg-speck-wap-wep-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsalz-drbg-speck-wap-wep/01/},
    author =    {Rich Salz},
    title =     {{No MTI Crypto without Public Review}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2016,
    month =     jul,
    day =       8,
    abstract =  {Cryptography is becoming more important to the IETF and its protocols, and more IETF protocols are using, or looking at, cryptography to increase privacy on the Internet {[}RFC7258{]}. This document specifies a proposed best practice for any mechanism (or data format) that uses cryptography; namely, that RFCs cannot specify an algorithm as mandatory-to-implement (MTI) unless that algorithm has had reasonable public review. This document also "sketches out" a rough definition around what such a review would look like.},
}