When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6
draft-richardson-roll-useofrplinfo-2460bis-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-01-19 (latest revision 2016-07-18)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-richardson-roll-useofrplinfo-2460bis-01.txt

Abstract

This document looks at different data flows through LLN (Low-Power and Lossy Networks) where RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) is used to establish routing. The document enumerates the cases where RFC 6553, RFC 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation is required. This analysis provides the basis on which to design efficient compression of these headers.

Authors

Ines Robles (maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com)
Michael Richardson (mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca)
Pascal Thubert (pthubert@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)