Considerations for stateful vs stateless join router in ANIMA bootstrap
draft-richardson-anima-state-for-joinrouter-01

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-01-22 (latest revision 2016-07-21)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Additional Resources
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-richardson-anima-state-for-joinrouter-01.txt

Abstract

This document explores a number of issues affecting the decision to use a stateful or stateless forwarding mechanism by the join router (aka join assistant) during the bootstrap process for ANIMA.

Authors

Michael Richardson (mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)