%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation instead of this I-D.
@techreport{rescorla-tls-renegotiation-01,
    number =    {draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiation-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiation/01/},
    author =    {Eric Rescorla and Marsh Ray and Steve Dispensa and One Way},
    title =     {{Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2009,
    month =     nov,
    day =       17,
    abstract =  {SSL and TLS renegotiation are vulnerable to an attack in which the attacker forms a TLS connection with the target server, injects content of his choice, and then splices in a new TLS connection from a client. The server treats the client's initial TLS handshake as a renegotiation and thus believes that the initial data transmitted by the attacker is from the same entity as the subsequent client data. This draft defines a TLS extension to cryptographically tie renegotiations to the TLS connections they are being performed over, thus preventing this attack.},
}