Skip to main content

Ability for a stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP
draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-05

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Aswatnarayan Raghuram , Al Goddard , Chaitanya Yadlapalli , Jay Karthik , Siva Sivabalan , Jon Parker , Dhruv Dhody
Last updated 2017-10-30
Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

The stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions provide stateful control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where a Path Computation Client (PCC) delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to a stateful PCE. There are use-cases in which a stateful PCE may wish to request and obtain control of one or more LSPs from a PCC. This document describes a simple extension to stateful PCEP to achieve such an objective.

Authors

Aswatnarayan Raghuram
Al Goddard
Chaitanya Yadlapalli
Jay Karthik
Siva Sivabalan
Jon Parker
Dhruv Dhody

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)