Differentiated Services Delay-and-Loss vs. Loss-Rate-Adaptive Service Classes
draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | James Polk , Toerless Eckert | ||
| Last updated | 2014-01-16 (latest revision 2013-07-15) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes-00.txt
Abstract
This document discusses how RTCWeb/RMCAT applications could best leverage existing and new DiffServ assignments and why we think it is necessary to differentiate the assignments of delay-and-loss- based vs. just-loss-based rate-adaptive video applications.
Authors
James Polk
(jmpolk@cisco.com)
Toerless Eckert
(eckert@cisco.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)