Implications of <retransmission-allowed> for SIP Location Conveyance
draft-peterson-geopriv-retransmission-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jon Peterson , Ted Hardie , John Morris | ||
| Last updated | 2008-02-17 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peterson-geopriv-retransmission-00.txt
Abstract
This document explores an ambiguity in the interpretation of the <retransmission-allowed> element of the Presence Information Data Format for Location Objects (PIDF-LO) in cases where PIDF-LO is conveyed by the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). It provides recommendations for how the SIP location conveyance mechanism should adapt to these ambiguities.
Authors
Jon Peterson
(jon.peterson@neustar.biz)
Ted Hardie
(hardie@qualcomm.com)
John Morris
(jmorris@cdt.org)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)