ACME Challenges Using an Authority Token
draft-peterson-acme-authority-token-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2018-09-06 (latest revision 2018-03-05) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peterson-acme-authority-token-01.txt
Abstract
A number of proposed challenges for the Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) effectively rely on an external authority issuing a token according to a particular policy. This document specifies a generic Authority Token challenge for ACME which supports subtype claims different identifiers or namespaces that can be defined to represent a specific application of this Authority Token challenge.
Authors
Jon Peterson
(jon.peterson@team.neustar)
Mary Barnes
(mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com)
David Hancock
(davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com)
Chris Wendt
(chris-ietf@chriswendt.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)