%% You should probably cite rfc7659 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{perrault-behave-natv2-mib-03,
	number =	{draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-03},
	type =		{Internet-Draft},
	institution =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	publisher =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	note =		{Work in Progress},
	url =		{https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-03},
        author =	{Simon Perreault and Tina Tsou and Senthil Sivakumar and Tom Taylor},
	title =		{{Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT)}},
	pagetotal =	83,
	year =		** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **,
	month =		** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **,
	day =		** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **,
	abstract =	{This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for devices implementing the Network Address Translator (NAT) function. The new MIB module defined in this document, NATV2-MIB, is intended to replace module NAT-MIB (RFC 4008). NATV2-MIB is not backwards compatible with NAT-MIB, for reasons given in the text of this document. A companion document deprecates all objects in NAT- MIB. NATV2-MIB can be used for monitoring of NAT instances on a device capable of NAT function. Compliance levels are defined for three application scenarios: basic NAT, pooled NAT, and carrier-grade NAT (CGN).},
}