Analysis of 64 Translation
draft-penno-behave-64-analysis-06
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Reinaldo Penno , Tarun Saxena , Mohamed Boucadair , Senthil Sivakumar | ||
| Last updated | 2013-02-20 (Latest revision 2011-01-05) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Due to specific problems, NAT-PT was deprecated by the IETF as a mechanism to perform IPv6-IPv4 translation. Since then, new efforts have been undertaken within IETF to standardize alternative mechanisms to perform IPv6-IPv4 translation. This document evaluates how the new translation mechanisms avoid the problems that caused the IETF to deprecate NAT-PT.
Authors
Reinaldo Penno
Tarun Saxena
Mohamed Boucadair
Senthil Sivakumar
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)