An investigation of handling of multipart/alternative in some common mailers in November 2000
draft-palme-multipart-language-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Jacob Palme 
Last updated 2000-11-13
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-palme-multipart-language-00.txt

Abstract

This memo describes an investigation of how some common mailers (Eudora, Pine, Hotmail, Outlook Express, Netscape, First Class, KOM 2000) handled the use of multipart/alternative with different languages in the different body parts. None of the mailers handled this very well. It seems as if none of the mailers can actually choose the part in the language preferred by the user. Some of them displayed all language parts, some arbitrarily chose to display only one part. The study compares different methods of specifying language translation in e-mail, but finds that no format seems to give satisfactory results with all the tested mailers.

Authors

Jacob Palme (jpalme@dsv.su.se)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)