%% You should probably cite rfc5058 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ooms-xcast-basic-spec-13,
    number =    {draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec-13},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec/13/},
    author =    {Dirk Ooms and Nancy Feldman and Yuji Imai and Wim P. Livens and Dr. Richard H. Boivie},
    title =     {{Explicit Multicast (Xcast) Concepts and Options}},
    pagetotal = 35,
    year =      2007,
    month =     jul,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {While traditional IP multicast schemes (RFC 1112) are scalable for very large multicast groups, they have scalability issues with a very large number of distinct multicast groups. This document describes Xcast (Explicit Multi-unicast), a new multicast scheme with complementary scaling properties: Xcast supports a very large number of small multicast sessions. Xcast achieves this by explicitly encoding the list of destinations in the data packets, instead of using a multicast group address. This document discusses Xcast concepts and options in several areas; it does not provide a complete technical specification. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.},
}