%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint instead of this I-D.
@techreport{nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-01,
    number =    {draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint/01/},
    author =    {Nagendra Kumar Nainar and Carlos Pignataro and Mustapha Aissaoui},
    title =     {{OSPFv3 CodePoint for MPLS LSP Ping}},
    pagetotal = 6,
    year =      2020,
    month =     mar,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {IANA has created "Protocol in the Segment IS Sub-TLV" registry and "Protocol in the Label Stack Sub-TLV of the Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV" under the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" registry. RFC8287 defines the code point for different Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP). This document proposes the code point to be used in the Segment ID Sub-TLV and Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV when the IGP protocol is OSPFv3. This document also requests to rename the existing codepoints of these two TLVs from OSPF to OSPFv2.},
}