Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Extension for Compression
draft-murchison-nntp-compress-06
Yes
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2016-11-21)
Unknown
Need to possibly create a new IETF mailing list for Expert Reviews (see Section 7.1.2).
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2016-11-01)
Unknown
Thanks for taking up the baton that TLS had to drop due to CRIME! 1.3: I hope the RFC editor can try new format things to meet these requests. One question for the authors might be whether you'd prefer an RFC now or to wait a bit (should a wait be needed) if tooling needs changes to handle properly representing folks' names? 2.2.1: the "algorithm" parameter description doesn't seem to match the example in 2.1 which specifies two algorithms. The ABNF seems to agree with 2.2.1.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-31)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing the SecDir review: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06916.html And also for letting us know about an upcoming draft that: 'discourages the use of TLS-level compression, thus dealing with authentication layered with a TLS-level compression method.' https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06923.html
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-31)
Unknown
"In the case of a conflict between these two documents, [RFC3977] takes precedence." Really? I'd hope there is no conflict... And nit? In sec 7: "it MUST use the STARTTLS, AUTHINFO, and COMPRESS commands in that order." and "That is why this specification only prohibits the use of AUTHINFO after COMPRESS." Should this be 'before' instead of 'after'...?
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown