Homenet IS-IS and Babel Comparison
draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Margaret Cullen  , Christian Hopps  , Juliusz Chroboczek 
Last updated 2015-09-06 (latest revision 2015-03-05)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02.txt

Abstract

This document is intended to provide information to members of the IETF Home Networks Working Group (Homenet WG), so that we can make an informed decision regarding which routing protocol to use in home networks. The routing protocols compared in this document are: The Babel Routing Protocol (Babel) and The Intermediate System to Intermediate System Intra-Domain Routing Protocol (IS-IS).

Authors

Margaret Cullen (mrw@painless-security.com)
Christian Hopps (chopps@chopps.org)
Juliusz Chroboczek (jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)