Homenet IS-IS and Babel Comparison
draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Margaret Cullen , Christian Hopps , Juliusz Chroboczek | ||
| Last updated | 2015-09-06 (latest revision 2015-03-05) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02.txt
Abstract
This document is intended to provide information to members of the IETF Home Networks Working Group (Homenet WG), so that we can make an informed decision regarding which routing protocol to use in home networks. The routing protocols compared in this document are: The Babel Routing Protocol (Babel) and The Intermediate System to Intermediate System Intra-Domain Routing Protocol (IS-IS).
Authors
Margaret Cullen
(mrw@painless-security.com)
Christian Hopps
(chopps@chopps.org)
Juliusz Chroboczek
(jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)