PREFIX64 Comparison
draft-miyata-behave-prefix64-02

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Hiroshi Miyata  , Marcelo Bagnulo 
Last updated 2009-03-09
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-miyata-behave-prefix64-02.txt

Abstract

This draft compares different IPv6 prefix formats that can be used by IPv6-IPv4 translator to represent IPv4 addresses in the IPv6 Internet. The goal of the draft is asses the benefits and problems of each proposed format and make a recommendation about which prefix to use in the different scenarios considered.

Authors

Hiroshi Miyata (h.miyata@jp.yokogawa.com)
Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)