%% You should probably cite draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-08 instead of this revision.
@techreport{mishra-6man-variable-slaac-00,
    number =    {draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac/00/},
    author =    {Gyan Mishra and Alexandre Petrescu and Naveen Kottapalli and Dusan Mudric and Dmytro Shytyi},
    title =     {{SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO (Variable SLAAC)}},
    pagetotal = 33,
    year =      ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **,
    month =     ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **,
    day =       ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **,
    abstract =  {This draft proposes the use of arbitrary length prefixes in PIO for SLAAC. A prefix of length 65 in PIO, for example, would be permitted to form an addresses whose interface identifier length is length 63, which allows several benefits. In the past, various IPv6 addressing models have been proposed based on a subnet hierarchy embedding a 64-bit prefix. The last remnant of IPv6 classful addressing is a inflexible interface identifier boundary at /64. This document proposes flexibility to the fixed position of that boundary for interface addressing.},
}