RoHC applicability in LPWAN
draft-minaburo-lpwan-rohc-applicability-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ana Minaburo , Laurent Toutain | ||
| Last updated | 2017-01-08 (latest revision 2016-07-07) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-minaburo-lpwan-rohc-applicability-00.txt
Abstract
This document makes a survey of the way to adapt the RoHC mechanisms to the LPWAN networks. It aims to show that RoHC header compression is not adapted for the constrained LPWAN networks. RoHC was defined to reduce the overhead over point-to-point connections for multimedia flows, which does not correspond to the LPWAN traffic description. RoHC is not able to reduce the use of battery and optimize the energy lifetime. If RoHC is used it will need a big effort to be adapted, there would be some problems to preserve a good transmission and packet lost will cause a context desynchronisation which implies a transmission of a complete header. LP-WAN's are different technologies covering different applications based on long range, low bandwidth and low power operation.
Authors
Ana Minaburo
(ana@ackl.io)
Laurent Toutain
(laurent.toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)