Minimal ESP
draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp-07
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(candidate for lwig WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Daniel Migault , Tobias Guggemos | ||
Last updated | 2018-10-21 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Call For Adoption By WG Issued | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes a minimal implementation of the IP Encapsulation Security Payload (ESP) defined in RFC 4303. Its purpose is to enable implementation of ESP with a minimal set of options to remain compatible with ESP as described in RFC 4303. A minimal version of ESP is not intended to become a replacement of the RFC 4303 ESP, but instead to enable a limited implementation to interoperate with implementations of RFC 4303 ESP. This document describes what is required from RFC 4303 ESP as well as various ways to optimize compliance with RFC 4303 ESP. This document does not update or modify RFC 4303, but provides a compact description of how to implement the minimal version of the protocol. If this document and RFC 4303 conflicts then RFC 4303 is the authoritative description.
Authors
Daniel Migault
Tobias Guggemos
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)