Routing Optimization with IP Fast Reroute
draft-menth-ipfrr-routing-optimization-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Michael Menth , Matthias Hartmann , David Hock | ||
Last updated | 2010-07-05 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft gives a summary of findings about routing optimization of not-via addresses [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses] and LFAs [RFC5286] in IP networks. The optimization is done only by tuning IP link costs. Optimization goals for both IP FRR techniques is the maximum link utilization in the failure-free scenario and for a set of failure scenarios such as all single link (and node) failures as well as the failure coverage by LFAs. For LFAs, the failure coverage is another optimization goal.
Authors
Michael Menth
Matthias Hartmann
David Hock
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)