MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
draft-mcwalter-uri-mib-04
Yes
(Bill Fenner)
No Objection
(Brian Carpenter)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2007-03-07)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel and Bert Wijnen contributed to the comments below: 1. The Introduction seems rather skimpy. This would be a good place to present an overview of the content of the MIB module and, in particular, a discussion of the text in the Description clauses with some guidance on how to choose between the three TCs that are defined. 2. All three Description clauses contain "...MUST be a normalized as defined..." This should read "...MUST be normalized as defined..." 3. All 3 TCs speak about use of these TCs as indices. If this is the case it may be wise to add some text that explains that - there is an absolute limit of 128 subids for an OID - even if the length is such that an OID is within 128 subids, it is not very efficient to have (very) long OIDs, so it is not very efficient to have an index of a URI that is up to say 120 octets.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-03-08)
Unknown
As I said in a never-responded-to last call comment, I believe the title of this document should make it clear that this is just a textual convention and for example not a set of objects to manage URIs served by a webserver.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown