Reporting Repository
draft-mcpherson-sattler-reporting-repository-03

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2019-10-15
Replaces draft-mcpherson-sattler-registry-reporting-repo
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
Internet Engineering Task Force                             N. McPherson
Internet-Draft                                              1&1 IONOS SE
Intended status: Best Current Practice                T. Sattler, Editor
Expires: April 15, 2020                                 October 15, 2019

                           Reporting Repository
            draft-mcpherson-sattler-reporting-repository-03

Abstract

   This document describes a Reporting Repository used to provide
   standardized Reports.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 15, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

McPherson & Sattler         Expires April 15, 2020              [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               Reporting Repository           October 2019

Table of Contents
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  SFTP Server . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  SFTP Account  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  SFTP Directory Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  SFTP Checksum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4 
   7.  SFTP Server Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   9.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   10. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     10.1.  united-domains Reselling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5   
   11. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     11.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     11.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Appendix A.  Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.1.  Change from 00 to 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.2.  Change from 01 to 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.3.  Change from 02 to 03  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.4.  Change from 03 to 04  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.5.  Change from 04 to 05  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.6.  Change from 05 to 06  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.7.  Change from 06 to REPO 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.8.  Change from REPO 00 to REPO 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     A.9.  Change from REPO 01 to REPO 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.10. Change from REPO 02 to REPO 03  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Appendix B.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   Modern top-level domain registries provide many detailed reports and
   documents that their registrars require on a daily, weekly and
   monthly basis. These most commonly include transaction reports, as
   well as lists containing currently unavailable domains and current
   premium domain fees. These reports are critical for registrars'
   businesses and play an important role in accounting and operations
   processes as well as in sales and marketing activities. In the
   current set-up, registrars must download these reports from each
   registry's intranet differently according to each registry's document
   management set up.

   This document describes a Reporting Repository used to provide
   standardized Reports.

2.  Terminology and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
Show full document text