%% You should probably cite draft-mattsson-tls-psk-ke-dont-dont-dont-05 instead of this revision.
@techreport{mattsson-tls-psk-ke-dont-dont-dont-00,
    number =    {draft-mattsson-tls-psk-ke-dont-dont-dont-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mattsson-tls-psk-ke-dont-dont-dont/00/},
    author =    {John Preuß Mattsson},
    title =     {{Key Exchange Without Forward Secrecy is Not Recommended}},
    pagetotal = 3,
    year =      ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **,
    month =     ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **,
    day =       ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **,
    abstract =  {Key exchange without forward secrecy enables passive monitoring {[}RFC7258{]}. Massive pervasive monitoring attacks relying on key exchange without forward secrecy has been reported {[}I-D.ietf-emu-aka-pfs{]}. If key exchange without Diffe-Hellan is used, compromise of the long-term authenticatation key enables a passive attacker to compromise past and future sessions. All TLS 1.2 cipher suites without forward secrecy has been marked as NOT RECOMMENDED {[}RFC8447{]}, and static RSA has been forbidden in TLS 1.3 {[}RFC8446{]}. psk\_ke does not provide forward secrecy and is NOT RECOMMENDED. This document sets the IANA registration of psk\_ke to NOT RECOMMENDED.},
}