GMPLS Extensions to OSPF and IS-IS for SONET/SDH Network Control
draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-ospf-isis-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Eric Mannie , Dimitri Papadimitriou | ||
| Last updated | 2002-10-07 (Latest revision 2002-07-02) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document introduces some of the extensions required in existing IGP routing protocols to support sub-sequent signalling for dynamically established SONET/SDH circuits using GMPLS-based control plane architecture [GMPLS-ARCH]. In particular, it specifies the GMPLS routing extensions to OSPF and IS-IS routing protocols for SONET/SDH networks using [GMPLS-RTG] as guideline. The current document is based on the Traffic Engineering (TE) extensions defined in [OSPF-TE] and [ISIS-TE]. It supports link bundling (aka TE Links) as defined in [MPLS-BDL]. This document proposes several new sub-TLVs for SONET/SDH network control which complement those proposed in [GMPLS-OSPF] and [GMPLS-ISIS]. The proposed encoding does not preclude any further integration in these documents that the current one intends to complement.
Authors
Eric Mannie
Dimitri Papadimitriou
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)