Distributed Mobility Management: Current practices and gap analysis
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Dapeng Liu , Anthony Chan , Pierrick Seite | ||
Last updated | 2013-02-22 (Latest revision 2012-12-08) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses how to best deploy the current IP mobility protocols in distributed mobility management (DMM) scenarios and analyzes the gaps of such best current practices against the DMM requirements. These best current practices are achieved by redistributing the existing MIPv6 and PMIPv6 functions in the DMM scenarios. The analyses is also applied to the real world deployment of IP mobility in WiFi network and in cellular network.
Authors
Dapeng Liu
Anthony Chan
Pierrick Seite
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)