Skip to main content

Soure Address Validation Architecture (SAVA): Intra-domain Use Cases
draft-li-sava-intra-domain-use-cases-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Dan Li , Jianping Wu , Yunan Gu , Lancheng Qin , Tao Lin
Last updated 2021-01-14 (Latest revision 2020-07-13)
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This document identifies scenarios where existing approaches for detection and mitigation of source address spoofing don't perform perfectly. Either Ingress ACL filtering [RFC3704], unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) [RFC3704], feasible path uRPF [RFC 3704], or Enhanced Feasible-Path uRPF [RFC8704] has limitations regarding eihter automated implemetation objective or detection accuracy objective (0% false positive and 0% false negative). This document identifies two such scenarios and provides solution discussions.

Authors

Dan Li
Jianping Wu
Yunan Gu
Lancheng Qin
Tao Lin

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)