Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling
draft-kompella-l2vpn-l2vpn-10
Yes
(Stewart Bryant)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2012-01-15)
Unknown
Nice documemnt, well positioned as complementary to the official IETF approach. Thanks. --- "PE" first appears in Section 1.1 without expansion.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-07)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-18)
Unknown
One non-blocking comment from the Gen-ART Review by Roni Even on 7-Sep-2011 has not been resolved. Please consider it: > > Section 4.2 refers to section 4 but I am not sure where this > mechanism in section 4 is.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-18)
Unknown
Where do the L2VPN TLVs go in the VPLS NLRI? Does the TLV(s) appear immediately after the VPKS NRLI when sent between the two PEs?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-19 for -09)
Unknown
A check that acronymns are expanded on 1st use would be good, e.g. DLCI was the one I noticed.