Skip to main content

IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for the IETF
draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2017-05-11
06 Suresh Krishnan Intended Status changed to Informational from Proposed Standard
2017-04-18
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2017-04-17
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2017-04-05
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Early review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Scott Bradner. Sent review to list.
2017-04-05
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Early review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-04-05
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Early review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-04-05
06 Gunter Van de Velde Requested Early review by OPSDIR
2017-04-05
06 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Telechat review by OPSDIR with state 'Team Will not Review Version'
2017-03-10
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2017-03-10
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2017-03-09
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2017-03-07
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2017-03-07
06 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2017-03-07
06 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2017-03-06
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2017-03-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2017-03-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2017-03-06
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2017-03-06
06 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2017-03-02
06 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2017-03-02
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2017-03-01
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-03-01
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-03-01
06 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR Completed: Serious Issues. Reviewer: Scott Bradner.
2017-03-01
06 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2017-03-01
06 Amanda Baber IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2017-03-01
06 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2017-03-01
06 Ben Campbell [Ballot comment]
I agree with Stephan's comment.
2017-03-01
06 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2017-03-01
06 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2017-03-01
06 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot comment]
I agree with Stephen's comment.
2017-03-01
06 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2017-03-01
06 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2017-03-01
06 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-06.txt
2017-03-01
06 (System) New version approved
2017-03-01
06 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Pat Kinney , Tero Kivinen
2017-03-01
06 Tero Kivinen Uploaded new revision
2017-02-28
05 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2017-02-28
05 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
= Section 1 =

"IEEE Std 802.15.4 [IEEE-802-15-4] is a standard, referred to by RFC
  4944
([RFC4944]), et al, that …
[Ballot comment]
= Section 1 =

"IEEE Std 802.15.4 [IEEE-802-15-4] is a standard, referred to by RFC
  4944
([RFC4944]), et al, that enables very low-cost, low-power
  communications."

Does "et al refer" to all the documents that update RFC 4944? Would probably be better to list them explicitly, the current text is ambiguous.
2017-02-28
05 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2017-02-28
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK
2017-02-27
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
Section 6 correctly says that  all IETF IE
subtypes need to be handled identically wrt
confidentiality. Doesn't that imply that we ought be …
[Ballot comment]
Section 6 correctly says that  all IETF IE
subtypes need to be handled identically wrt
confidentiality. Doesn't that imply that we ought be
conservative and encourage encryption of this IE
whenever it is used? While I don't think that'd
approach a MUST level requirement (and if we tried
we'd likely be ignored;-) I wonder if there are any
known or planned IETF IE subtypes for which we would
argue for a "SHOULD encrypt" statement?  If there
are, then I think that'd argue that we ought also
include that SHOULD here as well. If there are not,
then fair enough that 2119 language is probably not
appropriate (though generic encouragement to encrypt
would I think still be right)
2017-02-27
05 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment text updated for Stephen Farrell
2017-02-27
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
Section 6 correctly says that as all IETF IE
subtypes need to be handled identically wrt
confidentiality. Doesn't that imply that we ought …
[Ballot comment]
Section 6 correctly says that as all IETF IE
subtypes need to be handled identically wrt
confidentiality. Doesn't that imply that we ought be
conservative and encourage encryption of this IE
whenever it is used? While I don't think that'd
approach a MUST level requirement (and if we tried
we'd likely be ignored;-) I wonder if there are any
known or planned IETF IE subtypes for which we would
argue for a "SHOULD encrypt" statement?  If there
are, then I think that'd argue that we ought also
include that SHOULD here as well. If there are not,
then fair enough that 2119 language is probably not
appropriate (though generic encouragement to encrypt
would I think still be right)
2017-02-27
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2017-02-27
05 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot comment]
I guess the name of the new registry could be chosen more meaningful, maybe IEEE Std 802.15.4 IETF IE subtype IDs...?
2017-02-27
05 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2017-02-27
05 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2017-02-27
05 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2017-02-26
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2017-02-24
05 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2017-02-24
05 Suresh Krishnan Ballot has been issued
2017-02-24
05 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2017-02-24
05 Suresh Krishnan Created "Approve" ballot
2017-02-24
05 Suresh Krishnan Ballot writeup was changed
2017-02-24
05 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2017-02-23
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-02-23
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-02-22
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed
2017-02-22
05 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Services Operator has completed its review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let …
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Services Operator has completed its review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know.

The IANA Services Operator has a question about one of the actions requested in the IANA Considerations section of this document.

The IANA Services Operator understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which we must complete.

A new registry is to be created called the IETF IE subtype IDs registry.

IANA QUESTION -> Where should this new registry be located? Is it a new registry on the list of all IANA maintained protocol parameter registries or is it a subregistry of an existing registry? If it is a subregistry of an existing registry, in which registry will it be contained?

The new registry is to be managed through Expert Review as defined in RFC 5226. There are initial registrations in the new registry as follows:

+-----------+-------------------+-----------------+
| Value | Subtype ID | Reference |
+-----------+-------------------+-----------------+
| 0 | Reserved | [ RFC-to-be ] |
| 1-200 | Unassigned | [ RFC-to-be ] |
| 201-255 | Experimental Use | [ RFC-to-be ] |
+-----------+-------------------+-----------------+

The IANA Services Operator understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document.

Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.

Thank you,

Sabrina Tanamal
IANA Services Specialist
PTI
2017-02-22
05 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-05.txt
2017-02-22
05 (System) New version approved
2017-02-22
05 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Pat Kinney , Tero Kivinen
2017-02-22
05 Tero Kivinen Uploaded new revision
2017-02-15
04 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2017-02-15
04 Francis Dupont Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2017-02-10
04 Suresh Krishnan Telechat date has been changed to 2017-03-02 from 2017-02-16
2017-02-02
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-02-02
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-02-02
04 Jean Mahoney Requested Last Call review by GENART
2017-02-02
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Magnus Nystrom.
2017-01-27
04 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2017-01-27
04 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce"
CC: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, draft-kivinen-802-15-ie@ietf.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce"
CC: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, draft-kivinen-802-15-ie@ietf.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for IETF) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for IETF'
  as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-02-24. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  IEEE Std 802.15.4 defines Information Elements (IEs) that can be used
  to extend 802.15.4 in an interoperable manner.  The IEEE 802.15
  Assigned Numbers Authority (ANA) manages the registry of the
  Information Elements.  This document formulates a request for ANA to
  allocate a number from that registry for IETF, and describes how the
  IE is formatted to provide subtypes.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kivinen-802-15-ie/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kivinen-802-15-ie/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.




2017-01-27
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2017-01-27
04 Suresh Krishnan Last call was requested
2017-01-27
04 Suresh Krishnan Last call announcement was generated
2017-01-27
04 Suresh Krishnan Ballot approval text was generated
2017-01-27
04 Suresh Krishnan Ballot writeup was generated
2017-01-27
04 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2017-01-26
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Magnus Nystrom
2017-01-26
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Magnus Nystrom
2017-01-26
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-01-26
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-01-25
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-01-25
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2017-01-23
04 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2017-01-23
04 Suresh Krishnan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-02-16
2017-01-23
04 Suresh Krishnan Assigned to Internet Area
2017-01-23
04 Suresh Krishnan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2017-01-23
04 Suresh Krishnan IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2016-12-20
04 Francesca Palombini Changed document writeup
2016-11-17
04 Suresh Krishnan Notification list changed to "Francesca Palombini" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
2016-11-17
04 Suresh Krishnan Document shepherd changed to Francesca Palombini
2016-10-25
04 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt
2016-10-25
04 (System) New version approved
2016-10-25
03 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Tero Kivinen" , "Pat Kinney"
2016-10-25
03 Tero Kivinen Uploaded new revision
2016-10-24
03 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR Completed. Reviewer: Pascal Thubert.
2016-10-24
03 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR Completed. Reviewer: Charles Perkins.
2016-10-12
03 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-03.txt
2016-10-12
03 (System) New version approved
2016-10-12
02 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Tero Kivinen" , "Pat Kinney"
2016-10-12
02 Tero Kivinen Uploaded new revision
2016-10-11
02 Bernie Volz Closed request for Early review by INTDIR with state 'No Response'
2016-10-11
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Pascal Thubert
2016-10-11
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Pascal Thubert
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Charles Perkins
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Charles Perkins
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Closed request for Early review by INTDIR with state 'Withdrawn'
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Basavaraj Patil
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Basavaraj Patil
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to David Lamparter
2016-10-08
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to David Lamparter
2016-08-09
02 Suresh Krishnan Shepherding AD changed to Suresh Krishnan
2016-08-09
02 Suresh Krishnan Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2016-08-09
02 Suresh Krishnan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2016-08-09
02 Suresh Krishnan Stream changed to IETF from None
2016-04-22
02 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-02.txt
2016-04-07
01 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-01.txt
2016-03-15
00 Tero Kivinen New version available: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-00.txt