%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit instead of this I-D.
@techreport{keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01,
    number =    {draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/01/},
    author =    {Keyur Patel and Padma Pillay-Esnault and Manish Bhardwaj and Serpil Bayraktar},
    title =     {{H-bit Support for OSPFv2}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2015,
    month =     may,
    day =       21,
    abstract =  {OSPFv3 {[}RFC5340{]} defines an option field for router-LSAs known as a R-bit. If the R-bit is clear, an OSPFv3 router can participate in OSPF topology distribution without acting as a forwarder to forward the transit traffic. In such cases, an OSPF router would only accept traffic intended for local delivery. This draft defines R-bit functionality for OSPFv2 defined in {[}RFC2328{]}.},
}