%% You should probably cite draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{jiang-semantic-prefix-00,
    number =    {draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix/00/},
    author =    {Sheng Jiang},
    title =     {{Semantic IPv6 Prefix}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2012,
    month =     jul,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {Some Internet Service Providers desire to be aware of more information about each packet, so that packets can be treated differently and efficiently. IPv6, with a large address space, allows semantics to be embedded into addresses. Routers can easily apply relevant operations accordingly. This document provides analysis on how to form semantic prefix and corresponding use cases, and identifies the technical requirements to maximize the benefits of the semantic prefix approach. It is recommended to use 4\textasciitilde{}12 bits in prefix for embedded semantics.},
}