Skip to main content

Moving A6 to Historic Status
draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00

Yes

(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2012-01-16) Unknown
ID-nits flags:

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 1886
     (Obsoleted by RFC 3596)

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-01-16) Unknown
I would like it if the Abstract mentioned the RFC being moved to
historic (viz. 2874)
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-01-16) Unknown
Please make sure to incorporate the additional text agreed during the secdir review:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg03051.html
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-01-19) Unknown

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown