Current Open Questions in Path-Aware Networking
draft-irtf-panrg-questions-12
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-15
|
12 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2022-03-08
|
12 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 |
2022-02-01
|
12 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IANA Actions from In Progress |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2022-01-25
|
12 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Sent to the RFC Editor from In IESG Review |
2022-01-25
|
12 | Colin Perkins | Sent request for publication to the RFC Editor |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | Revised ID Needed tag cleared |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2022-01-25
|
12 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-12.txt |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | New version approved |
2022-01-25
|
12 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2022-01-25
|
12 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2021-12-06
|
11 | Colin Perkins | Tags IESG Review Completed, Revised I-D Needed set. |
2021-11-18
|
11 | Lars Eggert | None |
2021-11-17
|
11 | Lars Eggert | Shepherding AD changed to Martin Duke |
2021-11-17
|
11 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2021-11-17
|
11 | Amanda Baber | (Via drafts-eval@iana.org): IESG/Authors/ISE: The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-irtf-panrg-questions-11 and has the following comments: We understand that this document, which has no IANA … (Via drafts-eval@iana.org): IESG/Authors/ISE: The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-irtf-panrg-questions-11 and has the following comments: We understand that this document, which has no IANA Considerations section, doesn't require any registry actions. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Amanda Baber IANA Operations Manager |
2021-11-15
|
11 | Colin Perkins | IESG conflict review started |
2021-11-15
|
11 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to In IESG Review from Waiting for IRTF Chair |
2021-11-15
|
11 | Colin Perkins | IETF conflict review initiated - see conflict-review-irtf-panrg-questions |
2021-11-15
|
11 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Waiting for Document Shepherd |
2021-11-11
|
11 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-11.txt |
2021-11-11
|
11 | (System) | New version approved |
2021-11-11
|
11 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2021-11-11
|
11 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2021-10-11
|
10 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-10.txt |
2021-10-11
|
10 | (System) | New version approved |
2021-10-11
|
10 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2021-10-11
|
10 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2021-08-09
|
09 | Colin Perkins | IRSG poll completed. Awaiting response from author. |
2021-08-09
|
09 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Waiting for Document Shepherd from In IRSG Poll |
2021-08-09
|
09 | Colin Perkins | Closed "IRSG Approve" ballot |
2021-08-04
|
09 | Colin Perkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Colin Perkins |
2021-08-04
|
09 | Brian Trammell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Brian Trammell |
2021-07-27
|
09 | Jen Linkova | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jen Linkova |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] I had a quick read and it seems fine to me. I had expected to see some mention of the difficulty of meaningfully … [Ballot comment] I had a quick read and it seems fine to me. I had expected to see some mention of the difficulty of meaningfully naming path elements or on-path routers - "Do you 'trust' a path using 2001:db8::bad, 2001:db8::dead and 2001:db8::f001 for openvpn.service?" not being soemthing lending itself to being answered with a human or random machine endpoint in the loop;-) Similarly, I wondered why longer term state information didn't give rise to any tricky questions - "Do you want to use the same path you used last week when you were physically in the office (now that you're back stuck doing WFH)?" But maybe the RG considered those questions already covered by some of those mentioned in the draft, which is ok. |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Laurent Ciavaglia | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Laurent Ciavaglia |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to In IRSG Poll from Waiting for IRTF Chair |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Colin Perkins | Created IRSG Ballot |
2021-07-26
|
09 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Waiting for Document Shepherd |
2021-04-16
|
09 | (System) | Revised ID Needed tag cleared |
2021-04-16
|
09 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-09.txt |
2021-04-16
|
09 | (System) | New version approved |
2021-04-16
|
09 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2021-04-16
|
09 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2021-03-08
|
08 | Jen Linkova | Added to session: IETF-110: panrg Thu-1530 |
2021-02-08
|
08 | Colin Perkins | Does this need an update to address Adrian Farrell's comments? |
2021-02-08
|
08 | Colin Perkins | Tag Revised I-D Needed set. |
2021-01-15
|
08 | Colin Perkins | IRSG review by Laurent completed. Waiting for confirmation that the changes address the review comments before proceeding with the IRSG final poll. |
2021-01-15
|
08 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Waiting for Document Shepherd from IRSG Review |
2020-12-23
|
08 | (System) | Revised ID Needed tag cleared |
2020-12-23
|
08 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-08.txt |
2020-12-23
|
08 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-12-23
|
08 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2020-12-23
|
08 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-12-23
|
08 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-11-26
|
07 | Colin Perkins | Revised draft needed to address IRSG review from Laurent Ciavaglia. |
2020-11-26
|
07 | Colin Perkins | Tag Revised I-D Needed set. |
2020-11-26
|
07 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to IRSG Review from Awaiting IRSG Reviews |
2020-09-06
|
07 | Colin Perkins | IRTF state changed to Awaiting IRSG Reviews from Waiting for IRTF Chair |
2020-09-06
|
07 | Colin Perkins | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2020-09-02
|
07 | Jen Linkova | IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Waiting for Document Shepherd |
2020-09-01
|
07 | Spencer Dawkins | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were considered open … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were considered open as of 2019, that must be answered in the design, development, and deployment of path-aware internetworks. It was written to frame discussions in the Path Aware Networking proposed Research Group (PANRG), and is being published to snapshot thinking in this space. 2. Review and Consensus This document was the first document adopted by PANRG, and was presented and discussed at IETFs 100, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, and at a pre-IETF 108 interim meeting. In addition to comments made during meetings, detailed reviews were performed by Mohamed Boucadair and Theresa Enghardt. The research group does roughly agree that publication for this draft is appropriate. The text has been stable for most of the life of the draft, with most changes in response to detailed review comments, and the most recent revisions resulting from an effort to add a common description of "path awareness" that could be used by other PANRG drafts. 3. Intellectual Property Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR disclosures on the document. 4. Other Points There are no normative references in this document. The document introduces no new security considerations. |
2020-08-29
|
07 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-07.txt |
2020-08-29
|
07 | (System) | New version accepted (logged-in submitter: Brian Trammell) |
2020-08-29
|
07 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-08-24
|
06 | Spencer Dawkins | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were considered open … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were considered open as of 2019, that must be answered in the design, development, and deployment of path-aware internetworks. It was written to frame discussions in the Path Aware Networking proposed Research Group (PANRG), and is being published to snapshot thinking in this space. 2. Review and Consensus This document was the first document adopted by PANRG, and was presented and discussed at IETFs 100, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, and at a pre-IETF 108 interim meeting. In addition to comments made during meetings, detailed reviews were performed by Mohamed Boucadair and Theresa Enghardt. The research group does roughly agree that publication for this draft is appropriate. The text has been stable for most of the life of the draft, with most changes in response to detailed review comments, and the most recent revisions resulting from an effort to add a common description of "path awareness" that could be used by other PANRG drafts. 3. Intellectual Property Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR disclosures on the document. 4. Other Points There are no normative references in this document. The document introduces no new security considerations. There is one RFC 5743 nit - that document says o There must be a paragraph near the beginning (for example, in the introduction) describing the level of support for publication. Example text might read: "this document represents the consensus of the FOOBAR RG" or "the views in this document were considered controversial by the FOOBAR RG but the RG reached a consensus that the document should still be published". and I don't see one yet. Did I miss it? |
2020-08-24
|
06 | Spencer Dawkins | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Spencer Dawkins. The IRTF Chair is Colin Perkins. This document This document poses questions in path-aware networking that were considered open as of 2019, that must be answered in the design, development, and deployment of path-aware internetworks. It was written to frame discussions in the Path Aware Networking proposed Research Group (PANRG), and is being published to snapshot thinking in this space. 2. Review and Consensus This document was the first document adopted by PANRG, and was presented and discussed at IETFs 100, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, and at a pre-IETF 108 interim meeting. In addition to comments made during meetings, detailed reviews were performed by Mohamed Boucadair and Theresa Enghardt. The research group does roughly agree that publication for this draft is appropriate. The text has been stable for most of the life of the draft, with most changes in response to detailed review comments, and the most recent revisions resulting from an effort to add a common description of "path awareness" that could be used by other PANRG drafts. 3. Intellectual Property Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR disclosures on the document. 4. Other Points There are no normative references in this document. The document introduces no new security considerations. There is one RFC 5743 nit - that document says o There must be a paragraph near the beginning (for example, in the introduction) describing the level of support for publication. Example text might read: "this document represents the consensus of the FOOBAR RG" or "the views in this document were considered controversial by the FOOBAR RG but the RG reached a consensus that the document should still be published". and I don't see one yet. Did I miss it? |
2020-08-20
|
06 | Jen Linkova | IRTF state changed to Waiting for Document Shepherd from In RG Last Call |
2020-08-20
|
06 | Jen Linkova | Notification list changed to Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> |
2020-08-20
|
06 | Jen Linkova | Document shepherd changed to Spencer Dawkins |
2020-08-13
|
06 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-06.txt |
2020-08-13
|
06 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-08-13
|
06 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2020-08-13
|
06 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-08-13
|
06 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-06-30
|
05 | Jen Linkova | IRTF state changed to In RG Last Call |
2020-06-30
|
05 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-05.txt |
2020-06-30
|
05 | (System) | New version approved |
2020-06-30
|
05 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2020-06-30
|
05 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-06-30
|
05 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2020-06-26
|
04 | (System) | Document has expired |
2020-06-01
|
04 | Jen Linkova | Added to session: interim-2020-panrg-01 |
2019-12-24
|
04 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-04.txt |
2019-12-24
|
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-12-24
|
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2019-12-24
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2019-10-15
|
03 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-03.txt |
2019-10-15
|
03 | (System) | New version accepted (logged-in submitter: Brian Trammell) |
2019-10-15
|
03 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-08
|
02 | Jen Linkova | Added to session: IETF-105: panrg Thu-1330 |
2019-05-22
|
02 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-02.txt |
2019-05-22
|
02 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-05-22
|
02 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2019-05-22
|
02 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2019-05-22
|
02 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2019-04-20
|
01 | (System) | Document has expired |
2019-03-26
|
01 | Jen Linkova | Added to session: IETF-104: panrg Thu-0900 |
2019-03-26
|
01 | Brian Trammell | Intended Status changed to Informational from None |
2018-10-17
|
01 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-01.txt |
2018-10-17
|
01 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-10-17
|
01 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Brian Trammell |
2018-10-17
|
01 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-13
|
00 | (System) | Document has expired |
2018-07-05
|
00 | Jen Linkova | Added to session: IETF-102: panrg Fri-1150 |
2018-06-07
|
00 | Brian Trammell | This document now replaces draft-trammell-panrg-questions instead of None |
2018-04-11
|
00 | Brian Trammell | New version available: draft-irtf-panrg-questions-00.txt |
2018-04-11
|
00 | (System) | WG -00 approved |
2018-04-11
|
00 | Brian Trammell | Set submitter to "Brian Trammell ", replaces to (none) and sent approval email to group chairs: panrg-chairs@ietf.org |
2018-04-11
|
00 | Brian Trammell | Uploaded new revision |