Neighbor Cache Entries on First-Hop Routers: Operational Considerations
draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-05

Discuss

(Barry Leiba)

Yes

Warren Kumari

No Record

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Mahesh Jethanandani
Murray Kucherawy
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke

Summary: Has enough positions to pass.

Warren Kumari
Yes
Deb Cooley
No Record
Erik Kline
No Record
Francesca Palombini
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
John Scudder
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Murray Kucherawy
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Paul Wouters
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Record
Éric Vyncke
No Record
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Discuss
Discuss [Treat as non-blocking comment] (2020-09-06 for -04) Sent 
This is a very clear document, and this DISCUSS is literally that: a discussion I’d like to have before the IESG approves it.  My first thought was that this document reads more like a Standards Track Applicability Statement than an Informational document... but then there’s the 6man-grand “companion” that’s Standards Track.  And what I don’t understand is what the relationship is between this document and that one.  Why does this document exist?  Why isn’t it all in 6man-grand, and what’s the reason to be publishing two separate RFCs for this issue?  Neither the document nor the shepherd writeup explain that.