%% You should probably cite rfc8683 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-08, number = {draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/08/}, author = {Jordi Palet Martinez}, title = {{Additional Deployment Guidelines for NAT64/464XLAT in Operator and Enterprise Networks}}, pagetotal = 38, year = 2019, month = jul, day = 12, abstract = {This document describes how Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers (NAT64) (including 464XLAT) can be deployed in an IPv6 network -- whether it's cellular ISP, broadband ISP, or enterprise -- and the possible optimizations. This document also discusses issues to be considered when having IPv6-only connectivity, such as: a) DNS64, b) applications or devices that use literal IPv4 addresses or non-IPv6-compliant APIs, and c) IPv4-only hosts or applications.}, }