Skip to main content

DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Problems on Address and DNS Configuration
draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-06

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
Authors Bing Liu , Sheng Jiang , Xiangyang Gong , Wendong Wang , Enno Rey
Last updated 2016-08-09 (Latest revision 2016-02-06)
Replaces draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
Document shepherd Fred Baker
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem.all@tools.ietf.org

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Protocol includes an ICMPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) message. The RA message contains three flags, indicating the availability of address auto-configuration mechanisms and other configuration such as DNS-related configuration. These are the M, O, and A flags, which by definition are advisory, not prescriptive. This document describes divergent host behaviors observed in popular operating systems. It also discusses operational problems that the divergent behaviors might cause.

Authors

Bing Liu
Sheng Jiang
Xiangyang Gong
Wendong Wang
Enno Rey

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)