Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-00

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (tsvwg WG)
Author Bob Briscoe 
Last updated 2017-05-25 (latest revision 2016-11-21)
Replaces draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim, draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040bis
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Additional Resources
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document (wg milestone: Nov 2020 - Submit 'Propagating ... )
Document shepherd David Black
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to "David Black" <david.black@dell.com>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-00.txt

Abstract

RFC 6040 on "Tunnelling of Explicit Congestion Notification" made the rules for propagation of ECN consistent for all forms of IP in IP tunnel. This specification extends the scope of RFC 6040 to include tunnels where two IP headers are separated by a shim header that cannot stand alone.

Authors

Bob Briscoe (ietf@bobbriscoe.net)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)