Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms
draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt-04
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-22)
Unknown
When reading this, it wondered if the 2914 reference should be normative. I don't care one way or the other but might be worth 10 seconds of thought.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-17)
Unknown
I am not sure why section 5 (Conclusions) is needed, it looks like a leftover from previous versions of the document. Also why is it using the term 'researchers' instead of 'authors of congestion control schemes' for example?
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-06-06)
Unknown
I believe the document is a bit weak in its choice of words in some areas for a BCP (e.g., rather than "we would hope the guidelines in this document inform" simply state "the guidelines in this document inform").
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-22)
Unknown
The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo uncovered the following
IDNits tool complaints:
** There are 2 instances of too long lines in the document, the
longest one being 1 character in excess of 72.
** There are 70 instances of lines with control characters in the
document.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-22)
Unknown
If this is not a binding guideline, I don't understand why we are publishing as a BCP rather than informational. However the text is good so I'm not going to hold a discuss.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown