%% You should probably cite rfc8249 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-01,
    number =    {draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation/01/},
    author =    {Mingui Zhang and Xudong Zhang and Donald E. Eastlake 3rd and Radia Perlman and Vishwas Manral and Somnath Chatterjee},
    title =     {{TRILL IS-IS MTU Negotiation}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2015,
    month =     sep,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {The base IETF TRILL protocol has a TRILL campus wide MTU feature, specified in RFC 6325 and RFC 7177, that assures that link status changes can be successfully flooded throughout the campus while being able to take advantage of a campus wide capability to support jumbo packets. This document specifies optional updates to that MTU feature to take advantage, for appropriate link local packets, of link local MTUs that exceed the TRILL campus MTU. In addition, it specifies an efficient algorithm for local MTU testing. It updates RFC 7177.},
}