Skip to main content

Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) Supplement for the v1.0 Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP)
draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2003-07-22
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-07-22
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-05-29
02 Bill Fenner
Patrik tried several times to mark the -set document as approved and in the RFC Editor queue.  I'll try again, hopefully the tracker bug that …
Patrik tried several times to mark the -set document as approved and in the RFC Editor queue.  I'll try again, hopefully the tracker bug that was preventing this from happening properly has been fixed.
2003-05-29
02 Bill Fenner State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from IESG Evaluation by Fenner, Bill
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström
This is weird. I have no clue what I am doing. Is this a bug? Once again, the -set document is approved, the -papi is …
This is weird. I have no clue what I am doing. Is this a bug? Once again, the -set document is approved, the -papi is not.
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström Sigh, I changed the state of the wrong document. The -set document is approved. The -papi is not.
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström State Changes to IESG Evaluation from RFC Ed Queue by Faltstrom, Patrik
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström This for some weird reason has not changed the state in the tracker. Now done.
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from IESG Evaluation by Faltstrom, Patrik
2003-02-06
02 Patrik Fältström
The IESG must now have a (new) look at this. Was originally part of the same action as the v1.0-set document, but only the -set …
The IESG must now have a (new) look at this. Was originally part of the same action as the v1.0-set document, but only the -set document was announced and approved.

Now brought in front of the IESG again.
2002-11-14
02 Patrik Fältström
IANA consideration section needed. Will be added using an RFC-Editor note. From IANA:

Does this need to have an IANA Considerations section?

The reason I …
IANA consideration section needed. Will be added using an RFC-Editor note. From IANA:

Does this need to have an IANA Considerations section?

The reason I ask...

8.2.1 Definition of BrandId

  BrandId should be used registered identification for IANA.  Now, the
  following BrandIds have registered:

  Amex, Dankort, JCB, MasterCard, NICOS and VISA
2002-11-14
02 (System) IESG has approved the document
2000-11-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-02.txt
2000-09-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-01.txt
2000-03-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-00.txt