Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) Supplement for the v1.0 Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP)
draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2003-07-22
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2003-07-22
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-05-29
|
02 | Bill Fenner | Patrik tried several times to mark the -set document as approved and in the RFC Editor queue. I'll try again, hopefully the tracker bug that … Patrik tried several times to mark the -set document as approved and in the RFC Editor queue. I'll try again, hopefully the tracker bug that was preventing this from happening properly has been fixed. |
2003-05-29
|
02 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from IESG Evaluation by Fenner, Bill |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | This is weird. I have no clue what I am doing. Is this a bug? Once again, the -set document is approved, the -papi is … This is weird. I have no clue what I am doing. Is this a bug? Once again, the -set document is approved, the -papi is not. |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | Sigh, I changed the state of the wrong document. The -set document is approved. The -papi is not. |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from RFC Ed Queue by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | This for some weird reason has not changed the state in the tracker. Now done. |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from IESG Evaluation by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2003-02-06
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | The IESG must now have a (new) look at this. Was originally part of the same action as the v1.0-set document, but only the -set … The IESG must now have a (new) look at this. Was originally part of the same action as the v1.0-set document, but only the -set document was announced and approved. Now brought in front of the IESG again. |
2002-11-14
|
02 | Patrik Fältström | IANA consideration section needed. Will be added using an RFC-Editor note. From IANA: Does this need to have an IANA Considerations section? The reason I … IANA consideration section needed. Will be added using an RFC-Editor note. From IANA: Does this need to have an IANA Considerations section? The reason I ask... 8.2.1 Definition of BrandId BrandId should be used registered identification for IANA. Now, the following BrandIds have registered: Amex, Dankort, JCB, MasterCard, NICOS and VISA |
2002-11-14
|
02 | (System) | IESG has approved the document |
2000-11-27
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-02.txt |
2000-09-25
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-01.txt |
2000-03-10
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-set-00.txt |