%% You should probably cite rfc5746 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-tls-renegotiation-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation/03/},
    author =    {One Way and Marsh Ray and Steve Dispensa and Eric Rescorla},
    title =     {{Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      2010,
    month =     jan,
    day =       5,
    abstract =  {Secure Socket Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) renegotiation are vulnerable to an attack in which the attacker forms a TLS connection with the target server, injects content of his choice, and then splices in a new TLS connection from a client. The server treats the client's initial TLS handshake as a renegotiation and thus believes that the initial data transmitted by the attacker is from the same entity as the subsequent client data. This specification defines a TLS extension to cryptographically tie renegotiations to the TLS connections they are being performed over, thus preventing this attack. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}