%% You should probably cite rfc8370 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-07, number = {draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-07}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec/07/}, author = {Vishnu Pavan Beeram and Ina Minei and Rob Shakir and Dante Pacella and Tarek Saad}, title = {{Techniques to Improve the Scalability of RSVP Traffic Engineering Deployments}}, pagetotal = 11, year = 2017, month = sep, day = 27, abstract = {At the time of writing, networks which utilize RSVP Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) are encountering limitations in the ability of implementations to support the growth in the number of LSPs deployed. This document defines two techniques, "Refresh-Interval Independent RSVP (RI-RSVP)" and "Per-Peer Flow-Control", that reduce the number of processing cycles required to maintain RSVP-TE LSP state in Label Switching Routers (LSRs) and hence allow implementations to support larger scale deployments.}, }