%% You should probably cite rfc9270 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-04, number = {draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-04}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp/04/}, author = {He Jia and Italo Busi and Jeong-dong Ryoo and Bin Yeong Yoon and Peter Choongul Park}, title = {{GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Shared Mesh Protection}}, pagetotal = 11, year = 2020, month = sep, day = 9, abstract = {ITU-T Recommendation G.808.3 {[}G808.3{]} defines the generic aspects of a Shared Mesh Protection (SMP) mechanism, where the difference between SMP and Shared Mesh Restoration (SMR) is also identified. ITU-T Recommendation G.873.3 {[}G873.3{]} defines the protection switching operation and associated protocol for SMP at the Optical Data Unit (ODU) layer. RFC 7412 {[}RFC7412{]} provides requirements for any mechanism that would be used to implement SMP in a Multi-Protocol Label Switching - Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) network. This document updates RFC 4872 {[}RFC4872{]} to provide the extensions to the Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to support the control of the shared mesh protection.}, }